"The Axis of Dance" - Interview with Gagik GINOSYAN

    AAniv Magazine
    June 15, 2009
    "The Axis of Dance" - Interview with Gagik GINOSYAN

    "The Axis of the Dance", published in issue No. 3 (18) of the publication, is devoted to a conversation with Gagik Ginosyan — a veteran of a suicide squad who fought in Artsakh, and the founder and director of the traditional Armenian dance ensemble "Karin." The interview reveals the philosophy of Armenian dance, the history of its collection and restoration, and the concept of the ethnographic theater created by the interviewee.

    Introduction and methodology
    The conversation is structured as a sequential unfolding of the principles that distinguish Armenian dance from other dance traditions, drawing on personal experience of fieldwork collection, the mentorship of Hayrik Muradyan, and scholarly sources (the works of Komitas, the film records of Lisitsian).

    Key premise: the vertical nature of Armenian dance
    Ginosyan formulates the basic distinction between world dance traditions:

    • horizontal dances — movements of body parts relative to the body's axis, connected to the Earth and the sexual principle;
    • vertical dances — movements directed upward, toward Heaven, lacking any separate movement of the hips and pelvis (a taboo recorded by Komitas).

    Armenian dance belongs to the second category and is defined as "divine," shaping the national image.

    The problem of commercializing folk heritage
    The interviewee insists on the impermissibility of arbitrarily "reworking" folk songs and dances for the sake of spectacle, drawing a parallel with the impermissibility of altering architectural and sculptural monuments. A distinction is drawn between temporary and eternal art: alienating a people from the models of eternal art makes their decay and manipulability easier.

    Fieldwork collection
    A separate section is devoted to expeditions to the villages of Akhaltsikhe and Javakhk with the aim of restoring the Erzurum (Karin) dances, which had been lost in Armenia itself. Specific examples of informants are given — women aged 70 to 95 who preserved the movements and songs — along with the methodology of recording material on video.

    Ethnographic theater
    The text describes the transition from performing individual dances to creating theatrical productions ("The Father of Armenian Song," "The Land That Smells of Incense"), which unite song, dance, rites, and customs into a single whole, where dance is never separated from its context and ritual meaning.

    The semantic weight of individual dances
    Specific examples are examined — kochari as a totemic rite of initiation into manhood, gorani as a dance of collective grief and spring renewal, and the song "horovel" as a dialogue between the plowman and his ox — demonstrating the depth of ethnographic content hidden beneath the outward form.

    Conclusion
    The key conclusion of the interview is that preserving Armenian dance and song is equivalent to preserving the national essence of the people and their faith in returning to lost lands; authentic performance requires not mechanical reproduction of movements but a meaningful entry into the ritual and emotional context — that which distinguishes living folk art from something "plastic," devoid of soul.

    An interview with the director of the Karin ensemble on why Armenian dance is built around the body's vertical axis and what is lost when it is severed from its ritual meaning.

    The Vertical Axis of Dance

    ARTICLES
    ANIV MAGAZINE
    Interviews
    Support Us